Skip to main content

Data Consulting · Insight

Kenya’s Cancer Strategy 2023–2027: Unmeasured Targets and a KES 17.6bn Error

We compared Kenya’s last two National Cancer Control Strategies, 2017–2022 and 2023–2027. The burden is rising about 4% a year, most 2017 targets were never measured, and the new plan’s cost total counts one line twice.

By Chris Odoyo, Founder, Afiacity Healthcare Hub. October 2026, updated 23 October 2026. 12 minute read.

70 views 10 report downloads 5 report reads

or download the PDF (PDF, 10 pages, 724 KB)

Key findings

  1. The burden is growing faster than the population. New cases rise from 42,116 (2020) to a projected 58,000 in 2028 and 95,217 by 2040.
  2. Breast and prostate cancer are rising. Breast cancer has overtaken cervical cancer as the leading cancer in women.
  3. Cancer is mostly found late. About 7 in 10 cases are diagnosed at an advanced stage, and there are 0.64 deaths for every new case.
  4. The 2017 targets were never measured. The national risk-factor survey was not repeated, and only 28% of the 215 planned interventions were fully done.
  5. The 2023 plan overstates its cost by 56%. Its components add up to KES 31.6bn, not the KES 49.2bn it reports.
  6. Kenya trails its neighbours on prevention. In 2025, 25% of Kenyan girls had a first HPV dose by age 15, against 94% in Tanzania. See how Kenya compares.

The burden

Both strategies describe Kenya’s cancer burden using GLOBOCAN, the international agency estimates built from a few regional registries. Those registries cover only 5–10% of Kenyans, so the national figures are modelled, not counted.

  • 42,116new cancer cases in 2020
  • 27,092cancer deaths in 2020
  • 63%of new cases are in women
  • 78new cases per 100,000 people a year
Cancer cases and deaths across estimate years, with projections
New casesProjected new casesDeaths020,00040,00060,00080,000100,00037,00028,5002012GLOBOCAN 201247,88732,9872018GLOBOCAN 201842,11627,0922020GLOBOCAN 202058,0002028Projection95,2172040Projection2018 to 2020 drop is amethod change, not a decline New casesProjected new casesDeaths020k40k60k80k100k37k28.5k2012GLOBOCAN47.9k33k2018GLOBOCAN42.1k27.1k2020GLOBOCAN58k2028Projected95.2k2040Projected2018 to 2020 drop is amethod change, not a decline

Sources: NCCS 2017–2022 (GLOBOCAN 2012); NCCS 2023–2027 country profile and projections. The 2018 to 2020 drop reflects a change in estimation method, not a real decline.

Which cancers are rising

Between the 2012 and 2020 estimates, breast cancer rose and cervical cancer fell among women, prostate cancer rose sharply among men, and oesophageal cancer fell in both sexes. Breast, cervical, colorectal and prostate cancer, the four with screening or early-diagnosis pathways, make up 43% of all new cases.

Age-standardised incidence per 100,000, 2012 vs 2020
20122020, higher2020, lower010203040Age-standardised incidence per 100,000Breast (women)38.341.0Cervix (women)40.131.3Oesophagus (women)15.112.3Prostate (men)31.639.9Oesophagus (men)20.513.3 20122020, higher2020, lower010203040Age-standardised incidence per 100,000Breast (women)38.341.0Cervix (women)40.131.3Oesophagus (women)15.112.3Prostate (men)31.639.9Oesophagus (men)20.513.3

Sources: NCCS 2017–2022 (GLOBOCAN 2012); NCCS 2023–2027 Figure 1 (IARC 2020).

How lethal cancer is

For every 100 new cancer cases in Kenya, there are about 64 cancer deaths. For oesophageal, liver, pancreatic and lung cancer, the figure is above 90.

Deaths per new case by cancer site, 2020
Above the all-cancer ratioBelow itAll cancers 0.64deaths / cases0.000.250.500.751.00Deaths per new case, 2020Pancreas0.99800 / 809Liver0.93856 / 924Oesophagus0.922,743 / 2,974Lung0.92729 / 794Stomach0.841,501 / 1,781Leukaemia0.731,159 / 1,579Ovary0.71798 / 1,126Colorectal0.681,862 / 2,724Cervix0.613,211 / 5,236Non-Hodgkin lymphoma0.611,098 / 1,798Kaposi sarcoma0.59460 / 785Prostate0.521,780 / 3,412Breast0.463,107 / 6,799 Above the all-cancer ratioBelow itAll cancers 0.6400.250.50.751Deaths per new case, 2020Pancreas0.99Liver0.93Oesophagus0.92Lung0.92Stomach0.84Leukaemia0.73Ovary0.71Colorectal0.68Cervix0.61Non-Hodgkin lymph.0.61Kaposi sarcoma0.59Prostate0.52Breast0.46

Derived from NCCS 2023–2027 Appendix 3. A rough proxy for the share of patients who do not survive, sensitive to incomplete case-finding.

The main driver is late diagnosis: 70–80% of patients presented at an advanced stage in 2017, and about 69% still did in 2023. Childhood cancer survival is 20–30%, compared with more than 90% in high-income countries.

Where it is heading

Projected cases and deaths for breast, cervical and prostate cancer, 2020 to 2040
20202040 projectionNew cases04k8k12k16kBreast6,79914,700 +116%Cervical5,23611,200 +111%Prostate3,4129,600 +182%Deaths02k4k6k8kBreast3,1076,800 +119%Cervical3,2117,200 +125%Prostate1,7805,200 +189% 20202040 projectionNew cases04k8k12k16kBreast6,79914,700 +116%Cervical5,23611,200 +111%Prostate3,4129,600 +182%Deaths02k4k6k8kBreast3,1076,800 +119%Cervical3,2117,200 +125%Prostate1,7805,200 +189%

Source: NCCS 2023–2027 Figure 3 (Global Cancer Observatory). Projections assume today’s age-specific rates applied to a growing, ageing population.

What the two strategies set out to do

The 2023–2027 strategy is better structured, costed and benchmarked than its predecessor. It still starts from the same data gaps.

Dimension2017–20222023–2027What changed
Burden dataGLOBOCAN 2012GLOBOCAN 2018 and 2020, projections to 2040Updated
Risk-factor dataSTEPS survey 2015STEPS survey 2015Unchanged
Overall goalNot quantifiedCut premature cancer deaths by one third by 2028, with no baselineNot measurable
Quantified targets8, all in prevention and screening12 headline indicatorsImproved
Late-stage diagnosisFrom 80% to 40%From 69% to 50%Relaxed
Registry coverageAbout 10%5% high-quality, target 20%Not comparable
CostingNoneKES 31.6bn (stated as 49.2bn)Improved, with error
Where the 2017 plan aimed to be by 2022, and where the 2023 plan starts
2017 plan: baseline to 2022 target2023 plan: baseline to 2027/28 target0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%Tobacco use (adults)13.1%10%13.3%6.5%Alcohol use (adults)19%13%19%10%Cervical screening16%25%42%70%Late-stage diagnosis80%40%69%50% 2017 plan: baseline to 2022 target2023 plan: baseline to 2027/28 target0%20%40%60%80%Tobacco use (adults)13.1%10%13.3%6.5%Alcohol use (adults)19%13%19%10%Cervical screening16%25%42%70%Late-stage diagnosis80%40%69%50%

Sources: NCCS 2017–2022 implementation matrix; NCCS 2023–2027 strategies and Table 13. Tobacco and alcohol baselines in both plans come from the 2015 STEPS survey.

Stage by stage

Prevention Not measurable

2017–2022

  • Tobacco 13.1% to 10%
  • Alcohol 19% to 13%
  • Infection-related cancers 33% to 16%

2023–2027

  • Tobacco 13.3% to 6.5%, alcohol 19% to 10% by 2028
  • HPV vaccination 58% to 90% by 2030
  • Infections cause 31% of cancer cases

Targets doubled in ambition, but none of the 2017 risk-factor targets was re-measured.

Screening and early detection Expanded

2017–2022

  • Screening 16% to 25%
  • Cervical screening pilot in five counties

2023–2027

  • Cervical screening 31% or 42% to 70%
  • Breast screening 1% to 30%
  • Colorectal under 1% to 30%, with only a KES 78.2m pilot funded

Scope widened to three cancers; the colorectal target has no matching budget.

Diagnosis Target relaxed

2017–2022

  • 70–80% diagnosed late
  • Target 40%

2023–2027

  • 69% diagnosed late
  • Target 50%
  • National Cancer Reference Laboratory set up

About 10 points of improvement in five years; the new target is more realistic but slower.

Treatment and palliative care Quantified

2017–2022

  • Childhood survival 20–30%
  • Capacity not quantified

2023–2027

  • 12 cancer centres, 58 oncologists, 11 medical physicists
  • Treatment access 23% to 80%
  • Palliative care access 2% to 50%

The first quantified treatment targets; at about 726 new cases per oncologist, 80% access is a steep climb.

Registration and data Not comparable

2017–2022

  • Three registries covering about 10% of people
  • Two more planned by 2019

2023–2027

  • High-quality coverage 5% to 20%
  • No national burden report in five years

Routine facility data improved; population-level data did not.

Financing Costed, with error

2017–2022

  • Not costed

2023–2027

  • KES 31.6bn actual total
  • Cancer budget 0.8% to 10% of the health budget
  • One third of health spending is out of pocket

The first costed strategy, but its total is overstated.

The 2023–2027 headline indicators, from baseline to target
BaselineTarget0%20%40%60%80%100%HPV vaccination58%90% (2×)Breast screening1%30% (30×)Colorectal screening<1%30% (60×)Cervical precancer treatment26%90% (3×)Essential cancer treatment23%80% (3×)Childhood cancer survival20%60% (3×)Registry population coverage5%20% (4×)Palliative care access2%50% (25×)Cancer budget, % of health0.8%10% (12×) BaselineTarget0%25%50%75%100%HPV vaccination58%90% (2×)Breast screening1%30% (30×)Colorectal screening<1%30% (60×)Cervical precancer treatment26%90% (3×)Essential cancer treatment23%80% (3×)Childhood cancer survival20%60% (3×)Registry population coverage5%20% (4×)Palliative care access2%50% (25×)Cancer budget, % of health0.8%10% (12×)

Source: NCCS 2023–2027 Table 13. Multipliers show target divided by baseline.

The five-year cost, corrected, and the clinical budget by service
ProgrammeClinicalCapital01020304050KES billion, 2023 to 20276.617.67.46.617.67.4Clinicalagain +17.631.649.2Actual totalStated totalClinical budget by service012345Breast4.85Cervical3.46Prostate2.41Cervical screening1.98Childhood (all)1.68Colorectal1.10Oesophageal0.60Kaposi sarcoma0.53Gastric0.42Hep B screening (ANC)0.26Liver0.20Colorectal pilot0.08TreatmentScreening ProgrammeClinicalCapital01020304050KES billion, 2023 to 20276.617.67.46.617.67.4Clinicalagain +17.631.649.2Actual totalStated totalClinical budget by service012345Breast4.85Cervical3.46Prostate2.41Cervical screening1.98Childhood (all)1.68Colorectal1.10Oesophageal0.60Kaposi sarcoma0.53Gastric0.42Hep B screening (ANC)0.26Liver0.20Colorectal pilot0.08TreatmentScreening

Source: NCCS 2023–2027 Tables 10 and 11.

How Kenya compares

Kenya’s strategies only look inward. To see what the numbers mean, we set Kenya beside six African countries, India, and three high-income countries, using the newest international estimates (GLOBOCAN 2024, from the WHO’s International Agency for Research on Cancer) and WHO coverage data.

Cancer is less common here, and deadlier

After adjusting for age, Kenya records about 110 new cancers per 100,000 people a year, against 286 in the United Kingdom, 298 in the United States and 322 in Australia. Some of that gap is real and some is cancer that is never diagnosed. The outcome is not in doubt: Kenya counts 0.64 deaths for every new case, the same ratio its 2023 strategy reports. The three high-income countries see 0.33 to 0.44.

Cancer deaths per new case, 2024
KenyaComparison countryDeaths per new cancer case, 202400.20.40.60.8Kenya0.64Uganda0.61Tanzania0.65Ethiopia0.60Rwanda0.65Nigeria0.60South Africa0.59India0.58United Kingdom0.44United States0.33Australia0.33 KenyaComparison countryDeaths per new cancer case, 202400.20.40.60.8Kenya0.64Uganda0.61Tanzania0.65Ethiopia0.60Rwanda0.65Nigeria0.60South Africa0.59India0.58United Kingdom0.44United States0.33Australia0.33

Source: IARC Global Cancer Observatory, GLOBOCAN 2024, all cancers excluding non-melanoma skin cancer, both sexes. Ratio is deaths divided by new cases. African and Indian figures are modelled from a few regional registries.

Breast cancer: rarer, but more often fatal

A woman in Kenya is about a third as likely to be diagnosed with breast cancer as a woman in the United Kingdom (31.5 against 93.1 new cases per 100,000), yet more likely to die of it (16.2 against 14.1 deaths per 100,000). WHO sees the same pattern worldwide. In countries with a low Human Development Index, one woman in 27 is diagnosed with breast cancer in her lifetime and one in 48 dies of it. In countries with a very high index, one in 12 is diagnosed and one in 71 dies.

Cervical cancer is the widest gap

Cervical cancer is almost entirely preventable, which makes it the clearest measure of a health system. Kenya records 24.0 new cases and 14.9 deaths per 100,000 women. The United Kingdom, the United States and Australia record 5.4 to 7.6 new cases and fewer than 2 deaths. WHO counts cervical cancer as eliminated once a country falls to 4 or fewer new cases per 100,000 women a year.

Cervical cancer per 100,000 women, 2024
New cases per 100,000 womenDeaths per 100,000 womenWHO elimination line: 4 per 100,000010203040Kenya24.014.9Uganda38.223.1Tanzania24.815.3Ethiopia20.212.6Rwanda30.618.9Nigeria19.112.0South Africa27.414.4India10.54.9United Kingdom7.61.8United States6.01.8Australia5.41.5 New cases per 100,000 womenDeaths per 100,000 womenWHO elimination line: 4 per 100,000010203040Kenya24.014.9Uganda38.223.1Tanzania24.815.3Ethiopia20.212.6Rwanda30.618.9Nigeria19.112.0South Africa27.414.4India10.54.9United Kingdom7.61.8United States6.01.8Australia5.41.5

Source: IARC Global Cancer Observatory, GLOBOCAN 2024, age-standardised rates (world standard). Elimination threshold: WHO cervical cancer fact sheet, 3 July 2026.

Prevention: where Kenya trails its neighbours

WHO’s 2030 targets ask for 90% of girls vaccinated against HPV by age 15, 70% of women screened with a high-performance test by 35 and again by 45, and 90% of women with precancer or cancer treated. In 2025, 25% of Kenyan girls had a first HPV dose by age 15, against 94% in Tanzania, 84% in Rwanda and 77% in Uganda. Kenya’s programme figure for the same year is higher, at 69%, because catch-up campaigns also reach older girls.

Screening is low across the region. WHO estimates that 13% of Kenyan women aged 30 to 49 had been screened in the five years to 2019, well below both baselines in the 2023 strategy (31% and 42%).

HPV vaccination and cervical screening against WHO’s 2030 targets
KenyaComparison countryGirls with an HPV dose by 15 (2025)Target 90%0%50%100%Kenya25%Uganda77%Tanzania94%Ethiopia58%Rwanda84%Nigeria67%South Africa49%Indiano WHO estimateUnited Kingdom76%United States78%Australia80%Women 30–49 screened in 5 years (2019)Target 70%0%50%100%Kenya13%Uganda8%Tanzania11%Ethiopia3%Rwanda10%Nigeria11%South Africa43%India2%United Kingdom78%United States82%Australia84% KenyaComparison countryGirls with an HPV dose by 15 (2025)WHO target 90%0%50%100%Kenya25%Uganda77%Tanzania94%Ethiopia58%Rwanda84%Nigeria67%South Africa49%Indiano WHO estimateUnited Kingdom76%United States78%Australia80%Women 30–49 screened in 5 years (2019)WHO target 70%0%50%100%Kenya13%Uganda8%Tanzania11%Ethiopia3%Rwanda10%Nigeria11%South Africa43%India2%United Kingdom78%United States82%Australia84%

Sources: WHO/UNICEF estimates of national immunization coverage, HPV vaccination by age 15, first dose, females, 2025 (July 2026 release; no estimate for India). WHO Global Health Observatory, women aged 30 to 49 screened in the last five years, modelled 2019 estimates. WHO’s screening target counts a high-performance test by 35 and 45, so the 70% line is a guide, not a like-for-like comparison.

What the comparison tells us

  • Kenya’s problem is not how common cancer is. It is how often cancer kills, which points to late diagnosis and access to treatment.
  • HPV vaccination is the gain within closest reach. Tanzania, Rwanda and Uganda already vaccinate three to four times as many girls by age 15.
  • Better registry data would settle how much of the gap is real, and it would stop Kenya’s estimates swinging between editions.

Ten issues in the data

If you plan to cite either strategy, check these first. We rated each by how much it could change an analysis.

  • High

    The cost total counts clinical costs twice. The total is KES 31.6bn, not 49.2bn.2023 plan, Table 10

  • High

    The county incidence map uses implausible units. 1,200–2,000+ per 100,000 is about 20 times the national rate.2023 plan, Figure 4

  • Medium

    Prevalent cases by sex are likely swapped. 54,156 men and 28,464 women contradicts a 63% female share of new cases.2023 plan, Section 1.3

  • Medium

    Cervical screening has two baselines, 31% in the text and 42% in the indicator table.2023 plan

  • Medium

    Treatment access is given three ways: 23%, 26% and 28%.2023 plan

  • Medium

    2020 deaths appear as 27,092 and 26,872.2023 plan, Section 1.3 and Appendix 3

  • Medium

    Targets had no indicator definitions, so none could be evaluated at the end.2017 plan, implementation matrix

  • Low

    The tobacco baseline is 13.1% in one plan and 13.3% in the other, from the same survey.Both plans

  • Low

    The plan is described as costed, but costing was deferred.2017 plan

  • Low

    The goal promises to reduce “survival rate”, which should increase.2017 plan

What we would do next

Kenya’s 2023–2027 strategy is a stronger plan. Its value now depends on producing the data that shows whether it is working.

Now

  • Restate the cost as KES 31.6bn.
  • Reconcile the conflicting baselines and publish indicator definitions.

By the 2025 mid-term

  • Repeat the STEPS risk-factor survey.
  • Set a baseline for premature cancer deaths, ages 30–69.
  • Align the costing assumptions with the targets.

By 2027

  • Expand high-quality registry coverage to 20%.
  • Publish a national cancer burden report with stage at diagnosis.
  • Report deaths per case and stage by county.

How we did this

We extracted every reported statistic from the two strategies, including burden tables, pillar narratives, implementation matrices, results frameworks, costing tables and appendices, and read values from rendered figures where they were not available as text. We then computed derived measures (deaths per case, growth rates, implementation shares) and checked each table’s arithmetic.

All epidemiological figures are estimates reported in the strategies, mainly GLOBOCAN 2012, 2018 and 2020. Differences between editions mix real change with changes in method.

The full report, with every table and figure, is a 10-page document. Read it here on the site, or download the PDF (PDF, 10 pages, 724 KB).

Sources: Ministry of Health, Kenya (2017), National Cancer Control Strategy 2017–2022; Ministry of Health, Kenya (2023), The National Cancer Control Strategy (2023–2027).

Source documents and access record

Our figures come from the versions below, downloaded on the dates shown. The SHA-256 fingerprint identifies each exact file: if a document is later edited, its fingerprint changes. An independent copy of each file is held by the Internet Archive, and its fingerprint matches ours.

National Cancer Control Strategy 2017–2022
Ministry of Health, Kenya. Hosted by the National Cancer Institute of Kenya
Downloaded22 October 2026, 16:47 EAT Fromhttps://uploads.ncikenya.go.ke/uploads/policy/KENYA-NATIONAL-CANCER-CONTROL-STRATEGY-2017-2022.pdf File80 pages, 23.4 MB SHA-25635a67fd894db2da6bce0169a7e1e82aa472b3b0e754a27a8a7a46694c08f8ceb Archived copyInternet Archive, 23 October 2026 (same fingerprint)
The National Cancer Control Strategy (2023–2027)
Ministry of Health, Kenya. Hosted on the Ministry of Health guidelines portal
Downloaded22 October 2026, 16:49 EAT Fromhttp://guidelines.health.go.ke:8000/media/NATIONAL_CANCER_CONTROL_STRATEGY_2023-2027_7uTQQP4.pdf File98 pages, 22.8 MB SHA-25616f51ea6ffa500564dd49547586ee1e4f505bad29a207b4f342c358124edf476 Archived copyInternet Archive, 23 October 2026 (same fingerprint)

International comparison data

All accessed 23 October 2026.

Need this kind of review for your programme?

Afiacity Data Consulting turns health strategies, programme reports and pharmacy data into analysis you can defend.

  • Comparative reviews of national and county health strategies
  • Data-quality audits of indicators, baselines and costings
  • Epidemiological summaries and decision-ready reports

Chris Odoyo, Founder, Afiacity Healthcare Hub. Nairobi, Kenya.